Friday, February 14, 2014

12312


Saturday, January 18, 2014

Romney defends Christie's handling of bridge controversy

FILE: June 21, 2012: GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney speak in Orlando, Fla.AP
Former Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney is defended New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s handle of the so-called “bridge scandal” and doesn’t think the controversy will hurt his presidential chances.
“I think Chris has handling this in a very effective way,” Romney told The Washington Post.
Romney argued Christie took swift and decisive action upon learning a member of his administration did something he found reprehensible.
“He faced the American people for two hours, took their questions,” Romney told the paper. “He dismissed people who were responsible. He took personal responsibility. That’s what a leader does.”
Recently released emails and text messages show Christie aides and political associates orchestrated a massive traffic jam in Fort Lee, N.J., near the George Washington Bridge, as an apparent act of political retribution. That city’s Democratic mayor did not endorse Christie in his successful re-election effort last year.
Romney, a former governor of Massachusetts, also praised what he thinks was clear transparency in government, saying Americans  “are pining for leaders who will take responsibility.”
He said he doesn’t think Christie will be hurt by the controversy and that he’ll be “seen as a stronger leader” as time passes.
Romney has said recently he doesn't think his 2012 presidential bid was hurt by Christie embracing President Obama during Hurricane Sandy in the final days of the campaign, despite fellow Republicans still saying otherwise.
Romney also told the news paper that strong, potential 2016 Republican presidential candidates include Rep. Paul Ryan, Wis., former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, Sen. Marco Rubio, Fla., Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and Ohio Gov. John Kasich.

Why the 'Internet of Things' may never happen

It's also a lousy name for a great idea that is doomed from the start. Here's why. 

 

Computerworld - Research firm Gartner says the "Internet of Things" will have 26 billion connected devices by 2020.
Maybe. But connected to what? And how? Here's what you need to know about the "Internet of Things" phenomenon.

There will be no 'Internet of Things'

The label "Internet of Things" is used to describe Internet-connected devices that communicate without human involvement.
For example, as you read this article, you're using the regular Internet. You're a human being who is communicating with another human being (Yours Truly), and this communication is facilitated by many other human beings (editors, web designers, engineers, etc.). Like Soylent Green, the Internet is made out of people -- and computers whose main purpose is to help people use the Internet.
The "Internet of Things" is different mainly in that it's not made out of people.
Let's imagine a scenario 10 years into the future when the "Internet of Things" is supposed to be established. You come home with a hypothetical "smart toaster," which connects to the Internet. You plug it into a kitchen outlet. The toaster boots up, finds the home Wi-Fi network and sends out a query to all the other smart devices registered to you. Your alarm clock, smart toothbrush, TV, smartphones, tablets, PCs, smart glasses, smart smoke detector, home automation base station, smart clothes, smart fridge, smart washer and dryer and smart kitty litter box each in turn introduces itself to the toaster, telling its unique identifiers and what they're capable of doing. The toaster responds in kind. In the future, the toaster can send and receive instructions from other devices.
For example, you have friends over for breakfast and make several slices of toast. There's a lot of heat and a little smoke, and your smart smoke detector suspects a fire. So it sends out a message to the other devices saying, in effect, "is anyone creating heat and smoke?" The toaster can respond the equivalent of: "Yeah, it's me. No fire here and nothing to be alarmed about." So the smoke alarm doesn't sound.
"Things" are connecting to each other and interoperating without human involvement. That's one consumery example of the "Internet of Things." (There will be industrial and other applications on a massive scale.)
The "Internet of Things" is a bad name because "things" don't have their own Internet. They use the regular Internet. There is no separate "Internet of Things."
"Things of the Internet" would be closer. And "things that interact with other things without human involvement" would be even more accurate.
Another reason why the "Internet of Things" is a bad name is that the devices can make these connections without using the Internet. Some can connect peer-to-peer, or over a local network, without going online. The ability to connect to the Internet is not a necessary criterion for inclusion in the "Internet of Things" category.

Oh, and one more (fatal) problem

There's one more problem with the label "Internet of Things" -- it implies Internet-like compatibility and universality of communication standards that may never happen.
The basic standards for the Internet were developed before there were powerful companies with a vested interest in excluding competitors from markets. By the time the big Internet companies were rich enough to throw billions of dollars around to get their way, the standards, such as TCP/IP and others that make the Internet universal, were already well established.
This is not the case for the Internet of Things. The phenomenon is arising in an industrial environment of powerful companies that each want an unlevel playing field in their favor, or that have strong and mutually exclusive ideas about how the industry should work.
Former Apple executive Jean-Louis Gassée calls it the "basket of remotes" problem.

 

Security firm IntelCrawler says it has identified Target malware author

Phil Coale/AP - FILE - In this Jan. 18, 2008 file photo, a customer signs his credit card receipt at a Target store in Tallahassee, Fla.
Security firm IntelCrawler said Friday that it has identified a Russian teenager as the author of the malware probably used in the cyberattacks against Target and Neiman Marcus, and that it expects more retailers to acknowledge that their systems were breached.
In a report posted online, the Sherman Oaks, Calif., company said the author of the malware used in the attacks has sold more than 60 versions of the software to cybercriminals in Eastern Europe and other countries.

Properly-Designed Rough Surfaces can Reduce Drag: Study

Properly-Designed Rough Surfaces can Reduce Drag: StudyMajorly, objects moving through water are smooth. But as a research, a study carried out by a group of researchers from UCLA, bumpiness can be better in certain cases.
Prof. John Kim from the mechanical and aerospace engineering department at UCLA said that some rough surfaces are able to reduce skin-friction drag. Before, conducting the study, they used to believe contrary to the same.
In their study, fluid movement was monitored between two surfaces coated with small ridge. The study researchers found very astonishing results that the rough surface was able to reduce drag in bumpy conditions generated by the frictions of moving water.
Studies have been taken on the topic earlier as well, but not much success has been achieved. In the current study, the study researchers have modeled a superhydrophobic surface. The surface was coated with ridges and was positioned in the direction of water flow.
Laminar and turbulent flows, bother were modeled. To their surprise, the drag reduction was found to be greater in turbulent conditions. The revelation of the same has been published in the American Institute of Physics.
Prof. Kim said about properly-designed rough surfaces, "It could lead to significant energy savings and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions".

Batman vs Superman pushed back to 2016 by Warner Bros



Warner Bros has pushed back the release date of the as yet untitled film that will bring together superheroes Superman and Batman, delaying it by almost a year to May 2016, the studio has confirmed.

Ina statement, it said this was to "allow the filmmakers time to realize fully their vision, given the complex visual nature of the story.”
The sequel to last year's hit Superman film Man of Steel was revealed at the Comic-Con convention in July by director Zack Snyder, who said the two DC Comics' caped crusaders will face off against each other.
Replacing the Man of Steel sequel slot of 17 July, 2015 will be a still untitled production of Peter Pan, directed by Atonement's Joe Wright.
"We are happy to take advantage of these coveted summer dates, which are perfect for two of our biggest tentpole releases," said Dan Fellman, president of domestic distribution.
Many comic book fans were dismayed by the announcement that Ben Affleck would play Batman Many comic bookfans were dismayed by the announcement that Ben Affleck would play Batman
In August last year, Warner Bros President Greg Silverman confirmed Ben Affleck would play Batman in a decision that proved controversial among fans of the DC Comic hero.
Affleck, 41, who won multiple awards as the director of Iran hostage crisis film Argo earlier in 2013, will appear alongside British actor Henry Cavill, star of Superman reboot Man Of Steel.
Snyder said in a statement that Affleck will provide an “interesting counter-balance” to Cavill’s Superman.
“He has the acting chops to create a layered portrayal of a man who is older and wiser than Clark Kent and bears the scars of a seasoned crime fighter, but retain the charm that the world sees in billionaire Bruce Wayne,” Snyder said. “I can't wait to work with him."



Jezebel might not win for feminism with Lena Dunham's body

US site Jezebel has proudly published the results of its hunt for the pre-Photoshopped Vogue photos of Lena Dunham. But what does this achieve?
Writer, actor Lena Dunham in 'Girls'.
This week the US website Jezebel offered $10 000 to anyone who could provide the original, pre-Photoshop images of Lena Dunham's American Vogue cover story. Within two hours it had received six allegedly untouched images from the Annie Leibovitz shoot and published them, complete with a list of alterations. Dunham, the writer, and star of the hugely successful HBO series Girls, and the recipient of a $3.5-million book deal, has become a poster girl for her generation. Yet, she is in danger of being celebrated more for her nudity than her deft writing, humour or acting ability. It seems, even after three seasons, that all anyone can think about is Dunham's body.
I won't say Dunham has a normal body, because what does normal even mean? Five minutes in a communal swimming pool changing room will soon present you with a smorgasbord of flesh, a veritable feast of different shapes, sizes and colours of bodies. It is far easier to recognise what is not a normal body type: impossibly skinny, taut, hard, tanned, with breasts that defy gravity – the kind you see all the time in magazines, on television, and in films. Dunham does not have one of these abnormal bodies.
Dunham is also known for her robust attitude to those who try to "fat shame" her. She responded to bloggers who bitched about the size of her uncovered thighs: "Get used to it because I am going to live to be 100, and I am going to show my thighs every day till I die". Yet, despite such shrewd retorts, Dunham keeps being forced to defend her body, because people keep questioning it, as if they can't quite compute that she's actually standing there, all fleshy and real, without an Instagram filter.
Jezebel claims it has acted out of anger at US Vogue for retouching Dunham's image, saying that the editor-in-chief, Anna Wintour, "fixed" Dunham to make her "Vogue-worthy". By publishing the original pictures, Jezebel wants to declare Dunham as its own: a feminist, positive body image role model. Which is great, but it has actually acted at odds with its own beliefs. Offering money to expose images of Dunham as retouched, as opposed to any of the other myriad stars that have graced Vogue's pages, is yet just another form of obsession with the star's figure. The site seems outraged that the photos don't look like the real Lena Dunham. Well guess what? No one in Vogue looks like that in real life. Singling out one woman to out in this way is just another form of body shaming. It is no great win for feminism.
The damaging implications of retouched images, particularly on teenagers and young adults, have been widely discussed. In 2011, 76% of British MPs felt that airbrushing contributed to an unhealthy body image. About 40% thought secondary schools should have mandatory lessons on body image. As of yet, this is only recommended practice. There are no laws in place. Questioning the widespread use of retouching is a welcome discussion. Making an example of one woman's case detracts from the moral questions at play.
Vogue is a high-end fashion magazine and its capital is fantasy. As such it has provided a set of beautifully lit, whimsical images of Dunham that fit its illusory modus operandi. Vogue has delivered a very clear "after" to the naked and non-airbrushed "before" images of Dunham with which her Girls audience – largely made up of teens and young adults – are familiar. It is impossible to view the Vogue images and not comprehend the impact of retouching.
Whether Wintour intended it, Dunham's Vogue shoot has the potential to enlighten a generation to the gap between reality and retouching. That is the real win for feminism. – © Guardian News and Media 2014

At least 2 Americans killed in Kabul, Aghanistan restaurant attack that left 21 dead

A suicide bomber and two gunmen stormed a popular eatery in Afghanistan where foreign diplomats and wealthy Afghans congregate. The U.S. Embassy confirmed two American citizens were killed.

 

La Taverna du Liban, a popular Lebanese restaurant in Kabul, was targeted by a suicide bomber and two gunmen — killing two Americans and at least 19 others.


	epa04028134 Afghan security officials stand guard outside the damaged entrance of a Lebanese restaurant that was attacked in Kabul, Afghanistan, 18 January 2014. Thirteen foreigners were among 21 people killed in a Taliban attack in a section of the Afghan capital popular with diplomats, police said on 18 January. One suicide bomber blew himself up at the entrance to a Lebanese restaurant, opening the way for two gunmen to enter and shoot patrons and staff on 17 Janaury. EPA/S. SABAWOON
KABUL, Afghanistan — The death toll from a Taliban attack on a Kabul restaurant popular with foreigners and affluent Afghans has risen to 21 people, officials said Saturday, in the deadliest violence against foreign civilians in the country since the start of the war nearly 13 years ago.
Kabul police chief Gen. Mohammad Zahir Zahir said the victims included 13 foreigners and eight Afghans and said the majority were civilians. The U.S. Embassy said that at least two private U.S. citizens were among the victims but provided no other details.
The dead at the La Taverna du Liban restaurant included the head of the International Monetary Fund in Afghanistan, three United Nations staff and a member of the European Police Mission in Afghanistan. The UN had initially reported four dead, but had counted the IMF representative.
Zahir and international officials said the dead included two Britons, two Canadians, a Dane, a Russian, two Lebanese, a Somali-American and a Pakistani. At least four people were wounded and about eight Afghans, mostly the kitchen staff, survived.
Afghan policemen help an injured man at the site of a restaurant attack in Kabul.

Reuters

Afghan policemen help an injured man at the site of a restaurant attack in Kabul.

RELATED: U.S. SURVEILLANCE PLANE CRASH KILLS 3
Five women, four foreign and one Afghan, were also among the dead, Zahir said.
The three attackers, including a suicide bomber and two gunmen, were also killed during Friday night’s assault on the Lebanese restaurant.
The dead included the head of the IMF in Afghanistan, Wabel Abdallah, a 60-year-old Lebanese national; a Danish European Policewoman and her British bodyguard, while the U.N. in Kabul said its three staff members included a Pakistani, a Russian and a Somali-American. The restaurant’s Lebanese owner, Kamal Hamade, was also killed.
Afghan security forces investigate the aftermath of Friday's suicide attack and shooting in Kabul around dinnertime Friday.

Rahmat Gul/AP

Afghan security forces investigate the aftermath of Friday's suicide attack and shooting in Kabul around dinnertime Friday.

The attack was condemned by the U.N. Security Council, NATO and the European Union.
“I strongly condemn this attack on random civilians and my thoughts and deepest sympathy goes to the next of kin,” Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt said in a statement.
The Danish Foreign Ministry declined to release details about the victim as customary but Denmark’s TV2 said she was a 34-year-old woman.
Afghan police arrive at the scene of a suicide bomber and gun attack in Kabul on Friday. At least 16 people were killed at a Lebanese eatery frequented by foreigners and Afghans.

JOHANNES EISELE/AFP/Getty Images

Afghan police arrive at the scene of a suicide bomber and gun attack in Kabul on Friday. At least 16 people were killed at a Lebanese eatery frequented by foreigners and Afghans.

“I condemn in the strongest possible terms this appalling and unjustifiable violence. The perpetrators must be brought to justice,” EU High Representative Catherine Ashton said Saturday.
Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s office has not yet condemned the attack.
RELATED: GRUESOME PHOTOS SHOW MARINES TORCHING DEAD IRAQI INSURGENTS
The Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack, saying it was in reprisal for an Afghan military operation earlier in the week against insurgents in eastern Parwan province, which the insurgents claimed killed many civilians. The Taliban frequently provide exaggerated casualty figures.
Afghan police keep back traffic near a restaurant popular with Afghans and foreign diplomats that was attacked by gunmen and a suicide bomber on Friday night. At least 16 people died.

JOHANNES EISELE/AFP/Getty Images

Afghan police keep back traffic near a restaurant popular with Afghans and foreign diplomats that was attacked by gunmen and a suicide bomber on Friday night. At least 16 people died.

“The target of the attack was a restaurant frequented by high ranking foreigners,” Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said in an emailed statement. He said the attack targeted a place “where the invaders used to dine with booze and liquor in the plenty.”
He described the “revenge attack” as having delivered a “heavy admonitory blow to the enemy which they shall never forget.”
During the operation last Wednesday in eastern Parwan province, Afghan officials said that Taliban fighters opened fire on an Afghan commando unit trying to capture an insurgent leader in his home. After opening fire on the Afghan soldiers, killing one of their American advisers, the team called the U.S.-led coalition for air support.
RELATED: PRESIDENT OBAMA LOST FAITH IN AFGHAN MISSION: GATES
The governor of Parwan, Abdul Basir Salangi, said a Taliban leader, three of his family members and five civilians in a neighboring home, from which insurgents were also firing on the Afghan commandos, died in the ensuing combat. He added that seven Taliban fighters were also killed.
Insurgents have frequently targeted foreign interests around the country and in Kabul.
The deadliest previous attack against foreign civilians was in Sept. 8, 2012, when nine civilian employees of a private aviation company were killed in a suicide attack happened near Kabul airport. They included eight South Africans and a Kyrgyz.
The Taliban have stepped up a campaign of violence in recent months after foreign forces handed over control of security for the country to the Afghan army and police ahead of their full withdrawal by the end of 2014.

Update: Vatican clarifies number of defrocked priests

(CNN) The Vatican acknowledged on Friday that close to 400 priests left the priesthood in 2011 and 2012 because of accusations that they had sexually abused children.
That acknowledgment followed a report by the Associated Press that nearly 400 priests had been defrocked during those two years. The Vatican initially disputed that report.
Bishop Charles Scicluna, formerly the Vatican's top prosecutor of sexually abusive clergy, said 384 priests left the priesthood – either voluntarily or not - in 2011 and 2012, the last two years of Pope Benedict XVI's papacy.
In 2011, 125 priests were dismissed from ministry by the Vatican because of accusations they had sexually abused children, Scicluna told CNN on Friday, citing the "Activity of the Holy See," a kind of Vatican yearbook. The same year, 135  priests were "dispensed," meaning they voluntarily resigned, Scicluna said.
In 2012, 57 priests were removed from the priesthood and 67 resigned, Scicluna said. Scicluna, who is now an auxiliary bishop in Malta, was the Vatican's top prosecutor of sexually abusive clergy for a decade.
Scicluna said he did not know why the number of defrocked priests spiked in 2011. "2011 was exceptionally high for dismissals," he said. "We don't really know why."
The AP reported on Friday that nearly 400 priests had been defrocked in 2011 and 2012, citing a document the Vatican prepared to defend its record on sexual abuse before a United Nations committee this week in Geneva.
The Vatican had rebutted that report, a denial previously reported by CNN. However, later on Friday, Vatican spokesman Rev. Federico Lombardi told CNN the AP report was correct.